Today's blog post is not about information on the Marfan syndrome, which has to be worked out once more and sometimes less tedious and drawn to a blog post. It is about the thinking and behavior of some media in relation to the Marfan syndrome.
It annoys me off totally when I call a publisher in Germany to here to ask for permission if I an article in which it is the subject of "Marfan syndrome" that which has been printed in which, in recent months, allowed to show in this blog, after I have estimated the 20-IGST finally a phone call / s competent / s Contact Person / partner in the line to / of me then, after I submitted my request says that I should send the entire content is again via e-mail to a corresponding address, which I then turn (and only if the well-organized) to about 3 days following give the answer. Quote
first e-mail:
€ 150.00 Publisher and approval. € 75.00 image license do I find fairly rough. But interpret the buyers and readers of the newspaper to use the litter tray with it, I surely paid no € 225.00 . I must say that I would have hoped for more from this Gazette to help the Marfan syndrome continues to make public.
If I have to evaluate their behavior, I would give those on a scale of 1 to 5, a fourth (The license text has so wanted to be free, since one also in the network may add items if this marked as a quote and the source is stated)
Those who think that the isotopes can not be more wrong. An absolute 5 gets the following facts.
on request from a regional television station and serious, if you have a about 3 years old (!) Recording of a health program, the broadcast of these channels at the time, was made according to the Marfan syndrome by a detailed review may show here The editors after 4 days of content following reply: "You can publish the transcript. However, it will € 400.00 (!!!) due and is limited to one years (!!!) ".
I now ask myself seriously whether `s still going? What do managers at the sender, who decided that? Think maybe we could with the recording of the contribution of the Marfan syndrome Profit beat out? On what star live? I call it rip off deluxe! Mir is already clear that the production had required financial resources, but it may not acceptable for the one required for a 3 year old post so much money. What is this price be justified? I am sorry that this blog is not given the opportunity to publish these recordings here and thus a source of information can not be used because of the filthy lucre is worth more than the study and dissemination of information on the Marfan syndrome.
this post I could continue further, but I realize that I can improve myself absolutely pure in the matter and now trying to get the curve.
values so media representatives!
That also goes the other way around and that one does not account for all carbon, shows the blog post of the 3-year-old Melissa, when I called the author of the article, Rotenburger Observations and asked whether it oK be, would be if I can embed the photo in the Marfan syndrome blog. After they looked at the blog, she gave me two more photos via e-mail. That's what I call cooperation, thanks again.
This blog has never and will pursue commercial objectives. It is used with regard to information / procurement, the general awareness of Marfan syndrome and to provide help for those affected and their relatives. Likewise, this blog has been created to make contacts, if necessary by meetings of stakeholders where personal questions and problems can be pronounced.
For the future I would want to do me if the media is not one would make more difficult than the address the issue of Marfan syndrome already is.
It annoys me off totally when I call a publisher in Germany to here to ask for permission if I an article in which it is the subject of "Marfan syndrome" that which has been printed in which, in recent months, allowed to show in this blog, after I have estimated the 20-IGST finally a phone call / s competent / s Contact Person / partner in the line to / of me then, after I submitted my request says that I should send the entire content is again via e-mail to a corresponding address, which I then turn (and only if the well-organized) to about 3 days following give the answer. Quote
first e-mail:
" Dear Mr. xxx,quote second e-mail:
... When a new use of an article always a publishing permit is required. This is paid (€ 150.00) added text and image licenses. To the licenses for the text we would do without. The cost for the photo I have asked the yyy. "
" Dear Mr. xxx,Now you might say yes," man did, do not be so popular that one that's not easy without some agreement can upload it and the purchase must cost something "However
... for the use of the photograph 75 € will be charged. "
€ 150.00 Publisher and approval. € 75.00 image license do I find fairly rough. But interpret the buyers and readers of the newspaper to use the litter tray with it, I surely paid no € 225.00 . I must say that I would have hoped for more from this Gazette to help the Marfan syndrome continues to make public.
If I have to evaluate their behavior, I would give those on a scale of 1 to 5, a fourth (The license text has so wanted to be free, since one also in the network may add items if this marked as a quote and the source is stated)
Those who think that the isotopes can not be more wrong. An absolute 5 gets the following facts.
on request from a regional television station and serious, if you have a about 3 years old (!) Recording of a health program, the broadcast of these channels at the time, was made according to the Marfan syndrome by a detailed review may show here The editors after 4 days of content following reply: "You can publish the transcript. However, it will € 400.00 (!!!) due and is limited to one years (!!!) ". I now ask myself seriously whether `s still going? What do managers at the sender, who decided that? Think maybe we could with the recording of the contribution of the Marfan syndrome Profit beat out? On what star live? I call it rip off deluxe! Mir is already clear that the production had required financial resources, but it may not acceptable for the one required for a 3 year old post so much money. What is this price be justified? I am sorry that this blog is not given the opportunity to publish these recordings here and thus a source of information can not be used because of the filthy lucre is worth more than the study and dissemination of information on the Marfan syndrome.
this post I could continue further, but I realize that I can improve myself absolutely pure in the matter and now trying to get the curve.
values so media representatives!
That also goes the other way around and that one does not account for all carbon, shows the blog post of the 3-year-old Melissa, when I called the author of the article, Rotenburger Observations and asked whether it oK be, would be if I can embed the photo in the Marfan syndrome blog. After they looked at the blog, she gave me two more photos via e-mail. That's what I call cooperation, thanks again.
This blog has never and will pursue commercial objectives. It is used with regard to information / procurement, the general awareness of Marfan syndrome and to provide help for those affected and their relatives. Likewise, this blog has been created to make contacts, if necessary by meetings of stakeholders where personal questions and problems can be pronounced.
For the future I would want to do me if the media is not one would make more difficult than the address the issue of Marfan syndrome already is.
/ cz
0 comments:
Post a Comment