How To Connect My Ipod To Shareaza

And again, day in office day in office day in office audition a incapacitated suppressive person

day in office comes to the person concerned Mag.a H. and specifies:

I am using the administrator Dr. Weiser very dissatisfied. He does not care at all.
I still get frequent letters from collection agencies and I have to take care of itself. Dr. Weiser is for me is not accessible, I'm not sure if he gets everything that I continue to guide him. I can not get a receipt (or by mail or by normal post), maybe throw away everything the secretary. I also get a report, what is being done in practice.
On my account, no payments can be seen. I do not know what happened to the pending court proceedings (payment application). About

explanation that the interim trustee will establish a separate account for the income management (which will probably payments made), I admit that I also get no information (n must judge the error)

addition will be paid my income to my account and from there would go away so even payments. In this respect I do not believe that the interim trustee (Note: The Judge, Mrs honorable COUNCIL Mag Wieser do not even know that it has already been ordered by decision of 18 May 2009 Dr. Martin Weiser to the "final custodian" - it is has really built "Deppat") is a ward OWN ACCOUNT.

Furthermore, the open question concerning payment AJF. Dr. Weiser not interested.

the order for payment against the GE Money Bank became final, which takes Dr. Weiser in this regard is not known to me.

I am aware that the interim Trustee agrees (yes not, he is already by itself, the Deppat, was appointed the permanent trustee ....) is requested for reporting purposes, the further appeal is to be treated (which the person concerned is now in writing - that would not be necessary - tabled)

I give to have that something must. I complained international, maybe something will happen, if the citizen lawyer intervene (it does not then) I have also complained to the Bar Association.

end of the protocol, BG Wien-Liesing day in office - 30 June 2009

This text has therefore made this judge from what I have tried to tell her. Shocking. The Austrian Justice turns out to be a house of cards, as a dummy, which breaks at the slightest resistance together.

But at least they can tap, the judge, maybe she has completed the business academy in Mödling and knows it from there, otherwise they would not let him even get the Geschäfterln.

I remember a judge of the Juvenile Court, the 2nd on a typewriter the World War II with a finger (right index finger) to its protocols, decisions and judgments tapped. Since such a decision is Affected visit contact came out, was exactly where on page 1, the opposite of what was on page 4 and Conclusion of the decision meant.
Since that decision in 1998 from the Vienna Youth Court, I know what we to make of the Austrian justice and expect to have. Namely: nothing, nothing.